As we discussed in last week’s class, it
is important to decenter the meaning of “normal,” which is encoded with values
and concepts of power, in order to examine how representation affect what
society regard as cultural norms. This week’s reading takes off from this idea
and argues that perceptions of “others” based on the notion of cultural norm
affect the behaviors and communication towards people with difficult-abilities.
Thus, I agree with Kraft and Keifer-Boyd’s (2013) claim that we need to first
acknowledge that disability is a “social process” and identify the social
barriers that hinders these people to gain full access to engagement.
The reading for this week made me ponder
upon the word “access.” It is crucial to devise access to assist groups that
are unable to visit the museum due to their lack of mobility and create an
exhibition setting that caters to the diverse audience. What is equally
important, however, is to facilitate access to the ways of communication made
in the museum. In this light, I find that the Find Cards project practiced at
Maude Kerns Art Center exemplifies the process of connecting narratives in
relation to artworks in the museum that can assist this active conversation in
taking place among the audience. To perform such projects, I believe
that it is essential that the facilitator encourage the participants to believe
every artwork has the power to be experienced in different ways in accordance
with their desires. Every moment turns into a unique experience when they are
having a dialog with an artwork and establishing their own relationship with
the artwork, which also extends to a collective level when the participants
connect their own interpretation to each other’s. The positive effects that are
stimulated by engaging with art in a group setting increase meaningful social
interaction.
Another point that I would like to add is the importance to form a genuine partnership with the collaborating party. From a museum education standpoint, this can be strengthened by an interdisciplinary approach towards developing the curriculum of programs at the museum by seeking advice and support from partnerships. Museums should first devise procedures for effective cross-organizational collaboration and strategies to receive and provide support from community-based art organizations and school professionals. While the community-based art organizers and special educators can offer practical support in professional training sessions so that museum staff can get a better understanding of the target audience, the museum can arrange sessions that enable their partners to explore and use the museum resource and investigate ideas and activities to use with their participants during a museum visit.
Another point that I would like to add is the importance to form a genuine partnership with the collaborating party. From a museum education standpoint, this can be strengthened by an interdisciplinary approach towards developing the curriculum of programs at the museum by seeking advice and support from partnerships. Museums should first devise procedures for effective cross-organizational collaboration and strategies to receive and provide support from community-based art organizations and school professionals. While the community-based art organizers and special educators can offer practical support in professional training sessions so that museum staff can get a better understanding of the target audience, the museum can arrange sessions that enable their partners to explore and use the museum resource and investigate ideas and activities to use with their participants during a museum visit.
- Kraft, M. & Keifer-Boyd, K. (2013). Including difference. Reston, VA: NAEA. (Chapter 6).
No comments:
Post a Comment